Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps
Seismicity rate estimates and the earthquake forecasts they yield vary spatially and are usually represented as heat maps. While visualization literature suggests that displaying forecast uncertainty can improve how forecast maps are used, research on uncertainty visualization (UV) is missing from earthquake science. We present a pre-registered online experiment to test the effectiveness of three UV techniques for displaying aftershock forecasts. These maps show the expected number of aftershocks at each location for a week following a hypothetical mainshock, and we develop maps of the uncertainty around each location’s forecast. Human participants complete experimental tasks using the aftershock forecast displayed with its uncertainty. The forecast is derived from seismicity rate estimates for onshore Pacific Northwest earthquakes. Three different UVs are considered: (1) forecast and uncertainty maps adjacent to one another; (2) the forecast map depicted in a color scheme, with the uncertainty shown by the transparency of the color; (3) two maps that show the lower and upper bound of the forecast distriubiton at each location. We compare task performance using UVs versus using the forecast map shown without its uncertainty (the current practice). Subjects complete two map-reading tasks that target several dimensions of the readability of the UV. They then perform a comparative prediction task, which demonstrates whether a UV is successful in reaching two key communication goals: indicating where an aftershock and no aftershocks are likely (“sure bets’’) and where the forecast is low but the uncertainty is high enough to imply potential risk (“potential surprises’’). All UVs perform equally well in the goal of communicating “sure bet’’ situations. But the UV with lower and upper bounds is significantly better than the other UVs at communicating “potential surprises.” We discuss the implications of these results for better communication of not only forecast maps but other spatially-varying model products (e.g., seismic hazard maps).
Presenting Author: Max Schneider
Student Presenter: Yes
Day: 4/20/2021
Time: 5:30 PM - 6:45 PM Pacific
Additional Authors
Max Schneider Presenting Author Corresponding Author maxs15@uw.edu University of Washington |
Michelle McDowell mcdowell@mpib-berlin.mpg.de Harding Center for Risk Literacy |
Peter Guttorp guttorp@uw.edu University of Washington |
Ashley Steel asteel.usfs@gmail.com Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
Nadine Fleischhut fleischhut@mpib-berlin.mpg.de Max Planck Institute for Human Development |
|
|
|
|
Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps
Category
Earthquake Science, Hazards and Policy in Cascadia
Description