[Skip to Content]
Banner
Menu
  • Home
  • Submit Session Proposal
  • Home
  • 2021 Annual Meeting Gallery
  • Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps

← Back to Gallery

Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps

Seismicity rate estimates and the earthquake forecasts they yield vary spatially and are usually represented as heat maps. While visualization literature suggests that displaying forecast uncertainty can improve how forecast maps are used, research on uncertainty visualization (UV) is missing from earthquake science. We present a pre-registered online experiment to test the effectiveness of three UV techniques for displaying aftershock forecasts. These maps show the expected number of aftershocks at each location for a week following a hypothetical mainshock, and we develop maps of the uncertainty around each location’s forecast. Human participants complete experimental tasks using the aftershock forecast displayed with its uncertainty. The forecast is derived from seismicity rate estimates for onshore Pacific Northwest earthquakes. Three different UVs are considered: (1) forecast and uncertainty maps adjacent to one another; (2) the forecast map depicted in a color scheme, with the uncertainty shown by the transparency of the color; (3) two maps that show the lower and upper bound of the forecast distriubiton at each location. We compare task performance using UVs versus using the forecast map shown without its uncertainty (the current practice). Subjects complete two map-reading tasks that target several dimensions of the readability of the UV. They then perform a comparative prediction task, which demonstrates whether a UV is successful in reaching two key communication goals: indicating where an aftershock and no aftershocks are likely (“sure bets’’) and where the forecast is low but the uncertainty is high enough to imply potential risk (“potential surprises’’). All UVs perform equally well in the goal of communicating “sure bet’’ situations. But the UV with lower and upper bounds is significantly better than the other UVs at communicating “potential surprises.” We discuss the implications of these results for better communication of not only forecast maps but other spatially-varying model products (e.g., seismic hazard maps).


Presenting Author: Max Schneider

Student Presenter: Yes

Day: 4/20/2021

Time: 5:30 PM - 6:45 PM Pacific


Additional Authors

Max Schneider

Presenting Author

Corresponding Author

maxs15@uw.edu

University of Washington

Michelle McDowell

mcdowell@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

Harding Center for Risk Literacy

Peter Guttorp

guttorp@uw.edu

University of Washington

Ashley Steel

asteel.usfs@gmail.com

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Nadine Fleischhut

fleischhut@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

Max Planck Institute for Human Development

 

Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps

Category

Earthquake Science, Hazards and Policy in Cascadia

Description