[Skip to Content]
Banner
Menu
  • Home
  • Submit Abstract
  • Home
  • 2021 Annual Meeting Session Gallery
  • New Insights Into the Preparatory Phase of Earthquakes From Tectonic, Field and Lab Experiments II
  • Investigating Potential Earthquake Preparatory Phase From Short-Term and Long-Term Seismic Observations

← Back to Sessions

Investigating Potential Earthquake Preparatory Phase From Short-Term and Long-Term Seismic Observations

Session: New Insights Into the Preparatory Phase of Earthquakes From Tectonic, Field and Lab Experiments II

Type: Oral

Date: 4/19/2021

Presentation Time: 02:15 PM Pacific

Description: 

Predicting the timing and location of an upcoming hazardous earthquake has been the ultimate goal in the seismological community. Although it’s nearly infeasible to measure the in-situ stress field and rock strength at depths where majority earthquakes occur, both surface and borehole observations have shown evidence of seismic and aseismic deformation prior to the rupture of critically stressed faults. In this study, we present both a short-term foreshock study of the 2010 Mw7.2 El-Mayor Cucapah (EMC) earthquake and a long-term seismic analysis before the 2019 ML4.0 Ohio earthquake. For both cases, we apply waveform-based methods to identify hidden smaller events and further constrain their relative locations. The detailed analysis of the EMC foreshock sequence suggests a two-scale preparatory phase leading up to the mainshock: while an active chain of foreshocks occurred immediately (within ~300s) before the mainshock suggesting cascading effect, the elongated sequence (lasting ~21 days) as well as migrating seismicity within last 8 hours also invokes a preslip mechanism. By comparison, the long-term seismicity (2013-2019) before the 2019 Ohio earthquake shows a higher but nearly constant rate (20-30 earthquake/year) when compared to the ANSS catalog. Although no pronounced accelerating seismicity was observed before the Ohio earthquake, the Coulomb stress change from water loading on the associated faulting system indicates a small positive loading effect (~0.2 kPa) when Lake Erie was in high water-level condition and the mainshock happened. Our study highlights the importance of near-field observations to capture weak seismic signals, and the complex nucleation process of faulting systems.

Presenting Author: Dongdong Yao

Student Presenter: No


Authors

Dongdong Yao

Presenting Author

Corresponding Author

dongdony@umich.edu

University of Michigan

Yihe Huang

yiheh@umich.edu

University of Michigan

Zhigang Peng

zpeng@gatech.edu

Georgia Institute of Techonlogy

Liang Xue

lxue07@syr.edu

Syracuse University

Yuning Fu

yfu@bgsu.edu

Bowling Green State University

Raul Castro

raul@cicese.mx

Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE)

Jeff Fox

jeffrey.fox@dnr.ohio.gov

The Ohio Seismic Network, Ohio Geological Survey

Andrew Gronewold

drewgron@umich.edu

University of Michigan

 

Investigating Potential Earthquake Preparatory Phase From Short-Term and Long-Term Seismic Observations

Category

New Insights Into the Preparatory Phase of Earthquakes From Tectonic, Field and Lab Experiments