Room: 209B
Date: 4/19/2023
Session Time: 10:30 AM to 5:45 PM (local time)
Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning Applications in Seismology
Owing to the increase in the availability of large amounts of high-quality open source data, in recent years, we observed a successful surge in Machine Learning (ML) applications in Seismology. For instance, ML has largely been adopted in earthquake detection & seismic phase picking, in generating high-resolution earthquake catalogs, in discrimination and classification of seismic events, in earthquake early warning, in seismicity forecasting, in ground motion modeling and simulation, as well as in seismic inversion. Today, traditional ML techniques, such as CNN and LSTM networks trained over very large datasets, are successfully employed in operational conditions. Nonetheless, efficient training with small and imbalanced datasets, as well as extrapolation to new data are among the challenges that are still unresolved. On one hand, advanced ML techniques such as attention layers, autoencoders and transformers provide accurate and faster alternatives. On the other hand, physics-informed learning attempts to solve the mathematical problem using neural networks or kernel based approaches, nourished by real world data. Moreover, ML techniques are adopted to improve existing predictive tools, in a non-intrusive way. However, a thorough investigation of those data-driven techniques is demanded, in both existing and new research branches of seismology, before their deployment as operational models.
In this session, we invite contributions that explore the potential of ML for seismology. In particular, we are interested in studies focusing on developing state-of-the-art ML models for seismology and earthquake engineering, ML investigations of new research areas, and works highlighting issues related to methodologies in ML, data quantity and quality. Furthermore, we welcome contributions on research topics including null hypothesis testing, open databases for collaborative research, architecture & framework, software packages and development of research capabilities.
Conveners
Nishtha Srivastava, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, FIAS (srivastava@fias.uni-frankfurt.de)
Filippo Gatti, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay (filippo.gatti@centralesupelec.fr)
Quentin Brissaud, NORSAR (Norwegian Seismic Array) (quentin@norsar.no)
Claudia Q. Cartaya, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (quinteros@fias.uni-frankfurt.de)
Florent Aden, GNS Science (f.aden@gns.cri.nz)
Kiran k. Thingbaijam, GNS Science (k.thingbaijam@gns.cri.nz)
Oral Presentations
Participant Role | Details | Start Time | Minutes | Action |
---|---|---|---|---|
Submission | Pickblue: Seismic Phase Picking for Ocean Bottom Seismometers With Deep Learning | 10:30 AM | 15 | View |
Submission | Phasehunter: Seismic Wave Onset Time Determination Through Probabilistic Deep Learning Regression | 10:45 AM | 15 | View |
Submission | Calibrated Uncertainty Estimates for Deep Learning-Based Phase Arrival Time Estimates | 11:00 AM | 15 | View |
Submission | Ditingtools and Ditingbox: Seismic Big Data Processing via Edge and Cloud Computing | 11:15 AM | 15 | View |
Submission | Neural Mixture Model Association of Seismic Phases | 11:30 AM | 15 | View |
Other Time | Break | 11:45 AM | 135 | |
Submission | Semiai Seismic Detection and Picking: An Application to Active and Passive Seismic Data for the Tomography of the Stromboli Volcano Island. | 02:00 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Developing a Seismicity Catalog at Mayotte With Deep-Learning-Based Picking and Phase Association | 02:15 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Magma Movement Revealed by Unsupervised Spectral Feature Characterization of Seismicity at Axial Seamount | 02:30 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Medium Changes and Source Diversity Revealed by Unsupervised Machine Learning. | 02:45 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Mutual Information Between Seismic and Geodetic Data Revealed with Machine Learning in Mexico | 03:00 PM | 15 | View |
Other Time | Break | 03:15 PM | 75 | |
Submission | Pisgan: Physics-Informed Seismic Waveform Generator Trained With a Large-Scale Seismic Benchmark Dataset of China | 04:30 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Rapid 3D Seismic Waveform Modeling using U-Shaped Neural Operators (U-NO) | 04:45 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Ground Motion Models: Comparison Between Traditional Regression-based Techniques and Machine Learning Approaches | 05:00 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Applications of Machine Learning to Earthquake Early Warning and Ground Motion Prediction Equations | 05:15 PM | 15 | View |
Submission | Fully Automated DAS Signal Denoising Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning and Spliced Optical Fibers | 05:30 PM | 15 | View |
Total: | 435 Minute(s) |
Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning Applications in Seismology
Description