Room: Ballroom
Date: 4/19/2023
Session Time: 8:00 AM to 5:45 PM (local time)
Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning Applications in Seismology
Owing to the increase in the availability of large amounts of high-quality open source data, in recent years, we observed a successful surge in Machine Learning (ML) applications in Seismology. For instance, ML has largely been adopted in earthquake detection & seismic phase picking, in generating high-resolution earthquake catalogs, in discrimination and classification of seismic events, in earthquake early warning, in seismicity forecasting, in ground motion modeling and simulation, as well as in seismic inversion. Today, traditional ML techniques, such as CNN and LSTM networks trained over very large datasets, are successfully employed in operational conditions. Nonetheless, efficient training with small and imbalanced datasets, as well as extrapolation to new data are among the challenges that are still unresolved. On one hand, advanced ML techniques such as attention layers, autoencoders and transformers provide accurate and faster alternatives. On the other hand, physics-informed learning attempts to solve the mathematical problem using neural networks or kernel based approaches, nourished by real world data. Moreover, ML techniques are adopted to improve existing predictive tools, in a non-intrusive way. However, a thorough investigation of those data-driven techniques is demanded, in both existing and new research branches of seismology, before their deployment as operational models.
In this session, we invite contributions that explore the potential of ML for seismology. In particular, we are interested in studies focusing on developing state-of-the-art ML models for seismology and earthquake engineering, ML investigations of new research areas, and works highlighting issues related to methodologies in ML, data quantity and quality. Furthermore, we welcome contributions on research topics including null hypothesis testing, open databases for collaborative research, architecture & framework, software packages and development of research capabilities.
Conveners
Nishtha Srivastava, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, FIAS (srivastava@fias.uni-frankfurt.de)
Filippo Gatti, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay (filippo.gatti@centralesupelec.fr)
Quentin Brissaud, NORSAR (Norwegian Seismic Array) (quentin@norsar.no)
Claudia Q. Cartaya, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (quinteros@fias.uni-frankfurt.de)
Florent Aden, GNS Science (f.aden@gns.cri.nz)
Kiran k. Thingbaijam, GNS Science (k.thingbaijam@gns.cri.nz)
Poster Presentations
Participant Role | Details | Action |
---|---|---|
Submission | Comparative Study of the Performance of Seismic Waveform Denoising Methods | View |
Submission | Seismicity Behavior Within Rock Valley Illuminated by a Dense Nodal Deployment and Machine-Learning Methods | View |
Submission | Ensemble Learning for Earthquake Detection and Phase Picking: Methodology and Application | View |
Submission | Implementation and Testing of EQTransformer to Detect Microseismicity Near the Alpine Fault, South Island, New Zealand | View |
Submission | Expanding Wavelet-Transform-Based Neural Network Denoiser Performance Using Utah Regional Data | View |
Submission | Effective u.s. Event Classification Through Model Ensembling | View |
Submission | A Curated Pacific Northwest Seismic Dataset | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Automatic Seismic Monitoring Using Regional and Local Temporary Networks in Colombia | View |
Submission | Exploring Generalized Relationships Between Rockfalls and Seismograms | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Earthquake Detection in Subduction Zones: Transfer Learning With Amphibious Data From the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment | View |
Submission | Classifying Central and Eastern U.S. Seismic Events in the Earthscope Database Using Machine Learning and Lg-Wave Spectral Ratios. | View |
Submission | Employing Machine Learning Pickers for Routine Global Earthquake Monitoring With SeisComP: What are the Benefits and How Can We Quantify the Uncertainty of Picks? | View |
Submission | Latent Representations of Seismic Waves With Self-Supervised Learning | View |
Submission | Reconstructing Seismograms via Self-Supervised Learning: Methodology and Applications | View |
Submission | A Dataset of Regional Earthquake Waveforms | View |
Submission | Machine Learning Models for Urban Image Analysis: Building Height Estimation | View |
Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning Applications in Seismology [Poster]
Description