Untangling the Dynamics of the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence by Integrated Dynamic Rupture and Coulomb Stress Modeling Across an Immature 3D Conjugate Fault Network
Session: Exploring Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Wave Propagation Along Complex Fault Systems
Type: Oral
Date: 4/29/2020
Time: 03:30 PM
Room: 110 + 140
Description:
We present combined 3D dynamic rupture scenarios of the 2019 Mw6.4 Searles Valley and Mw7.1 Ridgecrest earthquakes closely constrained by observations, incorporating complex subsurface material properties, high-resolution topography and off-fault plastic deformation empowered by supercomputing.
A detailed 3D non-vertical fault model of the active quasi-orthogonal intersecting fault network is built by integrating relocated aftershocks and surface ruptures constrained by space geodesy and field observations. All faults are exposed to a 3D SCEC community stress model as well as long- and short-term static and dynamic stress transfers, which impact rupture dynamics, particularly in the vicinity of complexities in fault geometry.
By assuming apparently weak faults due to the effect of rapid velocity-weakening friction and elevated fluid pressure, we determine initial stresses and fault strength. Multi-fault rupture directivity and velocity of both events are constrained by aftershock calibrated back-projection.
In the presented scenario two conjugate faults simultaneously rupture in the Mw6.4 event, while only the SW-segment breaks the surface. The Mw7.1 event experiences the full final state of stress (dynamic plus static effects) of the Searles Valley scenario, leading to complex rupture including re-activation of the conjugate Mw6.4 segment, mixed crack and pulse-like propagation, tunneling beneath the fault intersection and choosing one Southern branch only. Both events exhibit a high dynamic stress drop reflecting the immature fault system. The foreshock induces a considerable Coulomb stress change in the Mw7.1 hypocentral region; however, not enough to trigger rupture across the stress-shadowed main fault. Both scenarios match key observations including magnitude, rupture speed, directivity, off-fault damage, slip distribution from kinematic inversion, teleseismic waveforms, GPS and InSAR ground deformation; while shedding light on geometric, strength and stress factors governing complex rupture evolution and interaction of the Ridgecrest sequence.
Presenting Author: Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman
Authors
Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman taufiqurrahman@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany Presenting Author
|
Alice-Agnes Gabriel gabriel@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany Corresponding Author
|
Sara Carena scarena@iaag.geo.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany |
Alessandro Verdecchia alessandro.verdecchia@mail.mcgill.ca McGill University, Montreal, , Canada |
Bo Li bo.li@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany |
Duo Li dli@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany |
Thomas Ulrich ulrich@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany |
Frantisek Gallovic gallovic@karel.troja.mff.cuni.cz Charles University, Prague, , Czech Republic |
Sara Aniko Wirp sara.wirp@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, , Germany |
Untangling the Dynamics of the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence by Integrated Dynamic Rupture and Coulomb Stress Modeling Across an Immature 3D Conjugate Fault Network
Category
Exploring Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Wave Propagation Along Complex Fault Systems