Room: Exhibit Hall
Date: 5/3/2024
Session Time: 8:00 AM to 5:45 PM (local time)
Efforts toward improving the resilience of urban environments to seismic hazards and associated geohazards are challenged by spatially variable ground motions and permanent ground deformations (e.g., due to co-seismic landslides or soil liquefaction). Regional-scale probabilistic seismic hazard and risk analyses are often used to evaluate large, distributed infrastructure systems such as pipelines and transportation networks in densely populated cities. While relevant work in the last decade has contributed toward multi-scale probabilistic modeling of regional ground shaking and deformation, important advances to support regional risk and loss assessments, financial loss considerations, and earthquake response tools remain missing. For instance, accurately characterizing the spatial variability of ground motions and their associated effects is important to capture the seismic risk of exposed communities in earthquake-prone areas, which is increasing with urbanization and, highly interdependent and aging infrastructure systems.
Even though there are common aspects between site-specific and regional seismic hazard and risk analyses, the characterization of ground motions, geologic conditions, and losses present different challenges to the data collection and modeling efforts. For instance, subduction zones, from the deep inslab environments through the megathrust and shallow crustal faults, present significant challenges when it comes to bridging the gap between earthquake science and application. Thus, this session invites contributions on 1) simulations and analyses of spatiotemporal variations of ground motion and deformation at regional scales, 2) tools developed for earthquake scenarios that capture the spatial correlation of ground motions, 3) advances in earthquake early-warning systems and rapid post-earthquake assessments, 4) methods based on the integration of site-specific data and geospatial analytics, 5) regional-scale approaches to estimate the occurrence and uncertainty of ground failure, 6) regional scale portfolio asset risk analyses and methodologies, 7) regional scale exposure and vulnerability assessments, and 8) specific applications of subduction zone science for hazard and loss modeling.
Conveners:
Ashly Cabas, North Carolina State University (amcabasm@ncsu.edu)
John Cassidy, Geological Survey of Canada (john.cassidy@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca)
Rodrigo Costa, University of Waterloo (rodrigo.costa@uwaterloo.ca)
Cassie Gann-Phillips, North Carolina State University (cvgann@ncsu.edu)
Mike Greenfield, Greenfield Geotechnical (mike@greenfieldgeotechnical.com)
Tiegan E. Hobbs, Geological Survey of Canada (thobbs@eoas.ubc.ca)
James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College (kaklamanosj@merrimack.edu)
Albert Kottke, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (albert.kottke@pge.com)
Sabine Loos, University of Michigan (sloos@umich.edu)
Cristina Lorenzo-Velazquez, North Carolina State University (clorenz@ncsu.edu)
Andrew Makdisi, U.S. Geological Survey (amakdisi@usgs.gov)
Hong-Kie Thio, AECOM (hong.kie.thio@aecom.com)
Eric Thompson, U.S. Geological Survey (emthompson@usgs.gov)
David Wald, U.S. Geological Survey (wald@usgs.gov)
Erin Wirth, U.S. Geological Survey (emoriarty@usgs.gov)
Poster Presentations
Participant Role | Details | Action |
---|---|---|
Submission | Seismic Geohazards in Italy: Seismic Geohazards in Italy: An Integrated Geotechnical Earthquake Hazard Assessment Map | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Seismic Hazard Assessment of Northern Pakistan, Nw Himalayas Using Machine Learning | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN Epistemic Uncertainty and Aleatoric Variability within Probabilistic Liquefaction Analysis | View |
Submission | Development of a Seismically Induced Landslide Susceptibility Scale for Greece for Addressing Data Imbalance | View |
Submission | A Future Scenario Earthquake and Ground Motion Hazards for Kathmandu, Nepal | View |
Submission | Offshore Seismic Hazards in Southern Cascadia | View |
Submission | Physics-based Seismic Hazard Assessment Using Multi-cycle Earthquake Simulations: Influence of Segment Connectivity and Strength Distribution | View |
Submission | Unraveling Seismic Complexity: Repeating Rupture Patterns and Varied Seismogenic Environments in the Mexico Subduction Zone | View |
Submission | Seismic Hazard Assessments for the Jackson Purchase Region (Upper Mississippi Embayment) Using Reelfoot Fault Scenarios and Site-Specific Vs Profiles | View |
Submission | Understanding Regional Site-Amplification Effects in the San Francisco Bay Region, California Through Ground-Motion Analysis and Modeling of Regional Seismic Velocity Structure | View |
Submission | An Empirical Bayesian Kriging Approach for Site Period Mapping of Santiago Basin, Chile | View |
Submission | WITHDRAWN A Remarkable Absence of Liquefaction: Data-Driven Lessons From the 2014 South Napa Earthquake | View |
Submission | Data-Driven Performance Evaluation of Ground Motion Models Applicable for Active Crustal Region in Italy | View |
Submission | National Seismic Hazard Assessment for Azerbaijan Using New Seismic Data and Ground Motion Simulations | View |
Submission | Towards Probabilistic Tsunami Risk Estimates Using Stochastic Earthquake Sources | View |
Submission | Influence of Site Effects’ Spatial Variability on Spatially Variable Ground Motion Intensity Measures | View |
Submission | Correlating Resonance Frequency From Hvsr With Vs30 Along the Wasatch Fault, Northern Utah, USA | View |
Submission | Improving Geospatial Liquefaction Prediction Models by Optimizing Non-Liquefaction Points Sampling: A Case Study of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence | View |
Submission | Dependence of Seismic Hazard Assessment on the Observation Time Interval: Insights From Physics-Based Simulated Seismicity in Southeastern Spain | View |
Regional-Scale Hazard, Risk and Loss Assessments [Poster Session]
Description