Forthcoming Updates of the USGS NSHMs: Hawaii, Conterminous U.S. and Alaska [Poster]
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Models (NSHMs) are the bridge between best-available earthquake science and public policy. In the next few years, the National Seismic Hazard Model Project (NSHMP) will complete three model updates: Hawaii (2020), the conterminous U.S. (COUS, 2023) and Alaska (2024?). The Hawaii seismic hazard model was last updated in 1998. The NSHMP is currently in the process of updating this model and held a public workshop in September 2019 to present early findings and solicit feedback from the scientific community. The current status of the model will be presented in this session, as well as preliminary hazard results. The COUS model was last updated in 2018 and includes NGA-East ground motion models (GMMs) in the central and eastern U.S. and basin amplifications in the western U.S. (WUS). The next model update for the COUS will be in 2023 with a focus on updating the WUS source model and subduction zone GMMs. The deadline for publications that the USGS may consider for this update is December 2020. We have also begun to plan for the Alaska NSHM, last updated in 2007.
For this session, we invite contributions relevant to the 2023 COUS and Alaska NSHM updates including, but not limited to: Atlantic and Gulf Coast and other alternative site amplification models, new fault models (WUS and Alaska), UCERF3 update/simplification, NGA-Subduction GMMs, physics-based (3D simulation) ground motion model validation and implementation, non-ergodic aleatory uncertainty, basin models, new geodetic data and inversions, M-area scaling relations and the Alaska megathrust geometry and recurrence.
Conveners
Allison M. Shumway, U.S. Geological Survey (ashumway@usgs.gov); Mark D. Petersen, U.S. Geological Survey (mpetersen@usgs.gov); Peter M. Powers, U.S. Geological Survey (pmpowers@usgs.gov); Sanaz Rezaeian, U.S. Geological Survey (srezaeian@usgs.gov)
Poster Presentations
Participant Role | Details | Action |
---|---|---|
Submission | 2023 Update of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model for the Conterminous US | View |
Submission | Should Site Response Be Incorporated into Central and Eastern US Hazard Maps? | View |
Submission | Regional Ground-Motion Effects from Intraslab Earthquakes in Northern Cascadia | View |
Submission | Observations of Ground Motion Amplification in the Seattle and Tacoma Sedimentary Basins from Local and Regional Earthquakes | View |
Submission | A Referenced Empirical Ground Motion Model for Arias Intensity and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Based on the NGA-East Database | View |
Submission | Impacts on Network Infrastructure Performance Assessments from Multi-Segment and Multi-Fault Ruptures in UCERF3 | View |
Submission | Alaska Transportable Array Seismic Attenuation Tomography from Local Earthquake P- and S-Waves: Tracing Faults From Southeast to Interior Alaska | View |
Submission | Stratigraphic and Microfossil Evidence of Repeated Late Holocene Tsunami Inundation at Sitkalidak Island, AK | View |
Submission | The Application of Diatom Analysis to Reconstruct Coseismic Uplift on Montague Island, Alaska | View |
Submission | Cycles of Earthquake Deformation on the Patton Bay Splay-Fault System Implied by Late Holocene Shoreline Evolution on Montague Island, Alaska | View |
Submission | Challenges in Assessing Earthquake Rates for Seismic Hazard in Hawaii | View |
Submission | Ground Motion Models for the Island of Hawaii Using the Hybrid Empirical Method | View |
Submission | Development of a Fault Source Parameters Database and Updates of the Fault Source Model for the US National Seismic Hazard Model | View |
Submission | U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Model Fault Section Database | View |
Submission | Migrating U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Models to the Cloud | View |
Submission | The 6th Generation Seismic Hazard Model of Canada | View |
Submission | Cross-Border Comparison Between Canada’s 6th Generation and the United States’ 2018 Seismic Hazard Models | View |
Submission | Spatial Correlation of Losses: Impact of Earthquake and Tsunami Source Model Assumptions | View |
Submission | Working Group for Development and Application of Methods for Non-Ergodic Ground-Motion Models | View |
Submission | Numerically Efficient Methodology for Developing Non-Ergodic Ground-Motion Models Using Large Datasets | View |
Submission | Using Bayesian Updating to Apply a Regionalized, Partially Nonergodic Ground-Motion Model to a New Region: Subduction Region as an Example | View |
Submission | Non-Ergodic FAS Ground-Motion Model for California | View |
Submission | A Induced Seismicity Non-Ergodic Ground Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) in the Oklahoma Region | View |
Submission | Risk Assessment of Building Structural Vulnerability in California Based on Non-Ergodic and Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis | View |
Submission | Non-Ergodic Scenario Maps for Performance Evaluation of Distributed Infrastructure | View |
Submission | Development of a Non-Ergodic GMPE for France | View |
Submission | Seismic Hazard Analyses of the MWD Emergency Freshwater Pathway, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California | View |
Submission | Widespread Failure of Delta Levees in a Hypothetical M7.0 Hayward Fault Earthquake | View |
Submission | Liquefaction Loss Estimation in the United States | View |
Forthcoming Updates of the USGS NSHMs: Hawaii, Conterminous U.S. and Alaska [Poster]
Description